Commons:Quality images candidates
These are the candidates for becoming quality images. Please note that this is not the same thing as featured pictures. Additionally, if you just want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at Commons:Photography critiques.
Purpose[edit]
The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.
Guidelines[edit]
All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.
For nominators[edit]
Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.
Image page requirements[edit]
- Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
- Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
- Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
- No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.
Creator[edit]
Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.
Technical requirements[edit]
More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.
Resolution[edit]
Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.
Image quality[edit]
Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.
Composition and lighting[edit]
The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.
Value[edit]
Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.
How to nominate[edit]
Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ |}}
The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}
Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.
Number of nominations[edit]
No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.
Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.
Evaluating images[edit]
When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.
How to review[edit]
Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.
- If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}
to
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}
In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.
- If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}
to
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}
In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.
Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.
Grace period and promotion[edit]
If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.
How to execute decision[edit]
QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.
If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.
If promoted,
- Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
- Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
- Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 2021.
- Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.
If declined,
- move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 2021.
- Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
- Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
- Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red
Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)[edit]
Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 25 2021 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.
Consensual review process[edit]
Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.
How to ask for consensual review[edit]
To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.
Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.
Consensual review rules[edit]
See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules
Page refresh: purge this page's cache
Nominations[edit]
Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:
--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 09:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
- Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
- Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
- If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms
December 25, 2021[edit]
- Nomination: Saint Petersburg. Russian Railway Museum. Diesel locomotive TE1-20-135 --Alexxx1979 09:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Saint Petersburg. Russian Railway Museum. Electric locomotives VL23-001 and ChS4-012 --Alexxx1979 09:39, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: "Houses in Puycelsi" by Georges Gaudion (by User:Archaeodontosaurus) -- Ikan Kekek 09:38, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Montjoire, Haute-Garonne, France (by User:Archaeodontosaurus) --Ikan Kekek 09:29, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Der Krinkberg ist eine archäologische Fundstätte in Schleswig-Holstein. --Nightflyer 09:28, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Saint-Pierre Church, in Santes, France --Velvet 08:43, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: The Château du Parc, Avenue Albert Bernard 15, Santes, France --Velvet 08:42, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Shell of a White-lipped snail, Cepaea hortensis --Llez 07:17, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Dokkum, Woudpoortbrug. across the Zuidergracht.
--Famberhorst 07:07, 25 December 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:38, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Dokkum, Woudpoortbrug. across the Zuidergracht.
- Nomination Field in the Börnste hamlet at the blue hour, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:22, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Pasture in the Börnste hamlet at the blue hour, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:22, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:04, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Group of trees in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:22, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:06, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Hattem, The High House.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 25 December 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Hattem, The High House.
- Nomination Werzer cinema on Werzer Promenade #1, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination «Congress Center» on Hauptstraße #203, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Hotel Astoria on Annastraße #43, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Werzer`s Hotel Resort on Werzerpromenade #8, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Werzer’s boathouse on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Fireworks on 14 July 2017 in Paris, France. --CaptainOlimar42 01:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Quality images have to be taken by a Wikimedian. I presume this is not your own photo on Flickr, but let us know if it is. -- Ikan Kekek 03:29, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Question What about FoP of the illuminated Eiffel Tower (here certainly not "de minimis")? --Llez 07:20, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Interior of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary church in Bach, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 01:35, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:26, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination View of Limogne-en-Quercy, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 01:35, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Mahonia aquifolium in Marroule, commune of Martiel, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 01:35, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 02:46, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Saints Peter and Paul church in Promilhanes, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 01:35, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review
IMO the branches are disturbing, at the left ones. --XRay 06:28, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Saint Bartholomew church in Varaire, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 01:35, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Ivan Lucic, goalkeeper of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The focus is sitting on his ears but not on his eyes. --Augustgeyler 02:46, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Christian Schoissengeyr, footballplayer of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 01:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Markus Blutsch, footballplayer of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Kevin Friesenbichler, footballplayer of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 01:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Nickla Dovedan, footballplayer of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 02:46, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
December 24, 2021[edit]
- Nomination: Flowers of three colours -- Alvesgaspar 23:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Intore dancer during the graduation festivities at Kicukiro stadium in Rwanda (by Shabanmasengesho) --Adoscam 22:48, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: مسفوف بالرمان والفستق (by Emna Mizouni) --Adoscam 22:44, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: A hamerkop (Scopus umbretta) about to eat a fish in Ethiopia (by Natnael Tadele) --Adoscam 22:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, Canary Islands: panoramic view. --Cayambe 22:25, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 01:40, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Estación de Roma, Gotland, cuberta de neve.Eu, como posuidor dos dereitos de autor desta obra, pola presente publícoa baixo a seguinte licenza: --Beninho 20:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:56, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Lápida medieval na igrexa de Kräklingbo, Gotland.Eu, como posuidor dos dereitos de autor desta obra, pola presente publícoa baixo a seguinte licenza: --Beninho 20:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Adult female northern harrier (Circus hudsonius) at the Llano Seco Unit of the Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge --Frank Schulenburg 19:49, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Staircase of the Michael Lee-Chin Crystal, Toronto, Canada--Maksimsokolov 15:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 19:49, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Mosaic Ceiling in Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Canada --Maksimsokolov 15:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 16:34, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination The byzantine church of Saint Irene in the cemetary of Agios Mamas, Crete. --C messier 15:25, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:15, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Volkswagen ID.4 GTX at IAA Mobility 2021.--Alexander-93 12:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:57, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Wey Coffee 01 PHEV at IAA Mobility 2021.--Alexander-93 12:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Wey Coffee 02 at IAA Mobility 2021.--Alexander-93 12:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: JR East E3-2000 series shinkansen at Fukushim Station. By User:Ka23 13 --Augustgeyler 12:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Chapel Bridge in Lucerne, Switzerland. By User:Roy Egloff --Augustgeyler 12:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:11, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Evangelical-lutheran church of St. Marien in Handorf (Lower Saxony), built in 1852-54, view from west
--F. Riedelio 11:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Evangelical-lutheran church of St. Marien in Handorf (Lower Saxony), built in 1852-54, view from west
- Nomination Entrance in the west side of the evangelical-lutheran church of St. Marien in Handorf (Lower Saxony), built in 1852-54
--F. Riedelio 11:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Entrance in the west side of the evangelical-lutheran church of St. Marien in Handorf (Lower Saxony), built in 1852-54
- Nomination Entrance in the west side of the evangelical-lutheran church of St. Marien in Handorf (Lower Saxony), built in 1852-54
--F. Riedelio 11:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Entrance in the west side of the evangelical-lutheran church of St. Marien in Handorf (Lower Saxony), built in 1852-54
- Nomination: Low German house in Handorf (Lower Saxony), built in 1821, view from southeast
--F. Riedelio 11:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Low German house in Handorf (Lower Saxony), built in 1821, view from southeast
- Nomination Low German house in Handorf (Lower Saxony), built in 1821, general view
--F. Riedelio 11:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 22:28, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Low German house in Handorf (Lower Saxony), built in 1821, general view
- Nomination Pilgrimage church St. Anna in Unterweilersbach --Ermell 11:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 11:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Aerial view of St. Cyriakus in Staffelbach --Ermell 11:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 11:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Aerial view of Staffelbach --Ermell 11:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 11:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Aerial view of Schlammersdorf in the district of Forchheim --Ermell 11:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 11:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Aerial view of Catholic Filial Church of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross in Schlammersdorf in the district of Forchheim --Ermell 11:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 11:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Bell tower of the St John the Baptist church in Pniewy, , Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 08:05, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Very soft. But QI. --Augustgeyler 11:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination St John the Baptist church in Pniewy, , Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 08:05, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion A bit soft, but ghood quality --Michielverbeek 09:58, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Windows of the St John the Baptist church in Pniewy, , Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 08:05, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support A bit soft, but good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Bell tower of the St John the Baptist church in Pniewy, , Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 08:05, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:57, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Window of the St John the Baptist church in Pniewy, , Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 08:05, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:57, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Warehouse of Ports of Lille, Boulevard de la Lorraine, in Lille, France --Velvet 08:01, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:09, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Workers' houses, Rue de l'Abbé Degruson 2 to 16, Haubourdin, France --Velvet 08:00, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:09, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Franeker. Martinikerk. Chandelier above the fore ship.
--Famberhorst 06:57, 24 December 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Franeker. Martinikerk. Chandelier above the fore ship.
- Nomination Town hall of Manhac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:35, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Ruisseau de Vayre near the placed named Verdun, commune of Quins, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:35, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Portal of the Saint Peter church in Rignac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:35, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Saint Gratus church in Memer, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:35, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Saint Amans church in Camboulazet, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:35, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Yokohama Municipal Subway Blue Line 3000 type train. --MaedaAkihiko 06:18, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Tokyo Metropolitan Bureau of Transportation, Asakusa Line 5300 series train. --MaedaAkihiko 06:18, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination IInside the JR East E235 series 0 series --MaedaAkihiko 06:18, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Limited express "Uwakai" by 2000 series running on the Uchiko line of JR Shikoku --MaedaAkihiko 06:18, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Tobu Railway 500 series train connection. --MaedaAkihiko 06:18, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Hortus Haren. Clitocybe
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 24 December 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Hortus Haren. Clitocybe
- Nomination Fence in the Börnste hamlet at the blue hour, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Trees in the Börnste hamlet at the blue hour, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Stream “Kettbach” in the Börnste hamlet at the blue hour, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Farm road in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:56, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Group of trees in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:56, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Gate of castle Leonstein on Leonsteinerstraße #1, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:34, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Shrub at the gate of castle Leonstein on Leonsteinerstraße #1, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:34, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination South portal of castle Leonstain on Leonsteinerstrasse #1, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:34, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Corporate signboard at castle Leonstain on Leonsteinerstrasse #1, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Corporate signboard at castle Leonstain on Leonsteinerstrasse #1, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination David Stec, footballplayer of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:00, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 03:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
December 23, 2021[edit]
- Nomination A small tower in the southeast corner of Vosakou Monastery, Crete. --C messier 19:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination View of Vosakou Monastery, Crete. --C messier 19:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Neptune Horizon (ship, 2010), leaving the harbour of Sète --Christian Ferrer 20:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Flower of a Cape Marguerite -- Alvesgaspar 17:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 20:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Remakri canal. --RockyMasum 17:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Remakri canal, Thanchi. --RockyMasum 17:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination The chimney of a high school in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: A tugboat with a tow wire out on the St. Lawrence Seaway. --GuavaTrain 16:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Ship Federal Danube docked outside of a lock. --GuavaTrain 16:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Ship Oakglen coming out of a lock. --GuavaTrain 16:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Poster with pairs of flowers -- Alvesgaspar 16:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Poster with three species of Cistus flowers -- Alvesgaspar 16:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Basilica of San Vitale --Commonists 14:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Close wing mud puddling behaviour of Pachliopta aristolochiae (Fabricius, 1775) – Common Rose.jpg (by Aniruddha97350) --Atudu 13:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose too soft, even worse if cropped --Charlesjsharp 16:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination A European Eagle-owl in captivity -- Alvesgaspar 11:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Soldier commodore (Junonia terea) female --Charlesjsharp 11:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --V.Boldychev 11:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Vulgar bush brown (Bicyclus vulgaris) --Charlesjsharp 11:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Spiny-backed orb-weaver (Gasteracantha sanguinolenta) female (size 10mm) --Charlesjsharp 11:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose unsharp and/or out of focus --Christian Ferrer 20:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Honey bee on a lesser calamint in the town of Königs Wusterhausen. --V.Boldychev 10:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 11:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination View of Trier, oil painting by Fritz Quant 1921. --Palauenc05 09:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Hard to say without seeing the original, but the lighting appears uneven: there appears to be some darker and brighter streaks across the painting. Are there any other reproductions of the original for comparison? --Lrkrol 10:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Comment The colours are OK, I've compared the image to the original. --Palauenc05 13:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Commonists 14:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality.The colors, the dertails and the brushwork are clearly visible.--Horst J. Meuter 14:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Aerial view of Eggolsheim --Ermell 08:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 14:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Neptune fountain in Gerolzhofen --Ermell 08:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Palauenc05 09:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Listed house in the Spitalstraße 3 in Gerolzhofen --Ermell 08:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Palauenc05 09:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Maës Residence, Place Jacquard 3 to 7, Lille, France --Velvet 07:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Barn in Handorf (Lower Saxony), view from east
--F. Riedelio 07:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC). The short 'line' in the sky left to the building should be removed. --Cayambe 00:07, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
New version Thanks for the review. I believe that the short 'line' was a bird. --F. Riedelio 11:07, 24 December 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality now. --Cayambe 22:01, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Barn in Handorf (Lower Saxony), view from east
- Nomination Barn in Handorf (Lower Saxony), view from northeast
--F. Riedelio 07:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 14:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Barn in Handorf (Lower Saxony), view from northeast
- Nomination: Barn in Handorf (Lower Saxony), view from north
--F. Riedelio 07:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Barn in Handorf (Lower Saxony), view from north
- Nomination: Choir of the evangelical-lutheran church of St. Marien in Handorf (Lower Saxony), built in 1852-54
--F. Riedelio 07:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Choir of the evangelical-lutheran church of St. Marien in Handorf (Lower Saxony), built in 1852-54
- Nomination: Entrance in the north side of the evangelical-lutheran church of St. Marien in Handorf (Lower Saxony), built in 1852-54
--F. Riedelio 07:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Entrance in the north side of the evangelical-lutheran church of St. Marien in Handorf (Lower Saxony), built in 1852-54
- Nomination Holy Spirit church in Pniewy, Greater Poland V., Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 07:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 14:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Holy Spirit church in Pniewy, Greater Poland V., Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 07:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Palace in Pniewy, Greater Poland Voivodeship, Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 07:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Palace in Pniewy, Greater Poland Voivodeship, Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 07:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: St John the Baptist church in Pniewy, , Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 07:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Bell tower of the St James church in Puylagarde, Tarn-et-Garonne, France. --Tournasol7 05:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: St Peter in chains church in Saillagol, Tarn-et-G., France. --Tournasol7 05:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Saint Peter in chains church in Vaylats, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 05:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Saint Magdalene church in Jamblusse, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 05:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Saint Martin church in Saillac, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 05:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Hattem, 14th-century citygate.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Hattem, 14th-century citygate.
- Nomination Prandtauerhof in Joching, Wachau Valley, Lower Austria - view from Danube. Vineyards in the background --Jakubhal 04:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Dominik Vydra, footballplayer of Austria U21 --Steindy 00:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Sascha Horvath, footballplayer of Austria U21 --Steindy 00:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 14:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
December 22, 2021[edit]
- Nomination Alloco et Poisson in ivoiry coast (by Zak Le Messager) --Adoscam 23:59, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 08:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Prepare Tunisian grilled salad (by Touzrimounir) --Adoscam 23:54, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Too blurry and object cut off. --Ermell 08:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination barbecue of meat in Tunisia (by Touzrimounir) --Adoscam 23:49, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Oversharpened IMO --Ermell 08:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: The Kiduku one of the most popular forms of dance in Tanzania, performed by people of all ages and most popular with children (by Rasheedhrasheed) --Adoscam 23:38, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review
The green fringes are disturbing. Fixable? --Ermell 08:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Abandoned house in Garazo, Crete. --C messier 19:55, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Ghirlandina (Modena) --Commonists 19:11, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Stone pathway, Sculpture Park of the Museum of Modern Art, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.Português: Trilha, Parque das Esculturas, Museu de Arte Moderna, Salvador, Bahia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Prburley 16:21, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Stone staircase, Sculpture Park of the Museum of Modern Art, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Prburley 16:21, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Millstone, Solar do Unhão plantation house (Museum of Modern Art of Bahia), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Prburley 16:21, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Detail of stairway designed by Lina Bo Bardi (1914-1992). Lateral corridor of the Capela de Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Solar do Unhão, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. --Prburley 16:15, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Sash window with red shutters, Capela de Nossa Senhora da Conceição (Chapel of Our Lady of the Conception), Solar do Unhão, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. --Prburley 16:10, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: A man is walking underneath the Azadi Tower in Tehran, Iran. --Lrkrol 14:56, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: View of the outer wall of the Arg of Karim Khan in Shiraz, Iran. --Lrkrol 14:56, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Mercado da Graça, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 10:16, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Very noisy. Fixable? --Ermell 21:47, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Portal of the Holy Spirit church in Pniewy, Greater Poland V., Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 08:57, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 14:16, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Altar in the Holy Spirit church in Pniewy, Greater Poland V., Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 08:57, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: View of the destroyed Dondarli (left) and Damirchilar (right) villages in Azerbaijan --Golden 08:31, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: View of the destroyed Damirchilar village in Azerbaijan --Golden 08:31, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
December 21, 2021[edit]
- Nomination: Bajramath templeThis is a photo of ASI monument number I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 20:30, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Template:Ping:Suyash.dwivedi QIC are expected to be well-documented. In this and the next 2 images (1) the caption/description needs to clearly explain what aspect of the temple is being depicted. (2) the CAT is Category:Hindola Torana whereas the description refers to Category:Bajramath temple. (3) Link N-MP-280 to en:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Monuments_of_National_Importance_in_Madhya_Pradesh/East --Tagooty 00:35, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Bajramath templeThis is a photo of ASI monument number I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 20:30, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Bajramath templeThis is a photo of ASI monument number I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 20:30, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Hoshangabad Railway station Sign boardI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 20:30, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Tilted, verticals are not not OK, detail is low. --Augustgeyler 12:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Athakamba templeThis is a photo of ASI monument number I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 20:30, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: The lake Pätzer Tonsee in the Dahme-Heideseen Nature Park in Bestensee, Germany. --V.Boldychev 16:32, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Honey bee on a lesser calamint in the town of Königs Wusterhausen, Germany. --V.Boldychev 16:32, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review
focus is on the wing I think --Charlesjsharp 16:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Königs Wusterhausen train station, a listed building in Germany. --V.Boldychev 16:32, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Hiking trail in the Tiergarten nature reserve in Königs Wusterhausen, Germany. --V.Boldychev 16:32, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Jina Para, Thanchi. --RockyMasum 14:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Place du Lion d'Or, in Lille, France --Velvet 08:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 11:19, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Kabini Reservoir east of Nagarhole Nat'l Park, panorama view SE, Karnataka --Tagooty 06:06, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Blue color cast. --F. Riedelio 11:21, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Ivan Lucic, goalkeeper of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:01, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
December 20, 2021[edit]
- Nomination: EuroLeague 2021/22, 13th day of play: ALBA BERLIN vs. Pallacanestro Olimpia Milano (81:76) – Kyle Hines, Oscar da Silva --Sandro Halank 19:52, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Sunflower at a flower shop in Rundle Mall, Adelaide. --BRPever 09:28, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Adelaide railway station during the evening busy hours. --BRPever 09:28, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review
I suggest correcting the verticals. --Augustgeyler 11:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
I have tried correcting it. Thanks --BRPever 09:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Bauble Canopy Lighting in Adelaide during day. --BRPever 09:28, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Chrysanthemum at a flower shop in Rundle Mall, Adelaide. --BRPever 09:28, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry: blown-out highlights, foreground too dark. --F. Riedelio 11:16, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Barn in Handorf (Lower Saxony), view from west
--F. Riedelio 07:41, 20 December 2021 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Barn in Handorf (Lower Saxony), view from west
- Nomination: Barn in Handorf (Lower Saxony), view from southwest
--F. Riedelio 07:41, 20 December 2021 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Barn in Handorf (Lower Saxony), view from southwest
- Nomination: St Lawrence church in Pniewy, Greater Poland V. Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 07:05, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Ivan Lucic, goalkeeper of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
December 19, 2021[edit]
- Nomination: Banner of a demonstration about Algeria in en:Saint-Étienne, France, in December 2021. --Touam 20:38, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Perception Sculpture. Santiago. Chile --Rjcastillo 18:35, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: A picture of the JW Marriott Jakarta hotel at dusk before sunset located at south Jakarta --Vitaium 10:58, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review Comment Verticals to be straightened, see Image guidelines --Palauenc05 23:00, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
New version Thanks for the review. --Vitaium 15:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Comment Thanks for correcting the verticals, but there are some more issues. Someone else may decide. --Palauenc05 22:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: This is the picture of South Jakarta city building complex skyline at sunset --Vitaium 10:58,19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review Perspective needs to be corrected. --Cayambe 17:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
New version Thanks for the review. --Vitaium 15:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC) Comment The perspective is not entirely corrected: please look at the right two buildings. The cut-off building at the left should be cropped away. --Cayambe 00:02, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Gable of a residential/farm building in Handorf (Lower Saxony)
--F. Riedelio 08:04, 19 December 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
The gable is unfortunately very blurred. Fixable? --Ermell 09:23, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 10:43, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Gable of a residential/farm building in Handorf (Lower Saxony)
- Nomination Residential/farm building in Handorf (Lower Saxony), view from northeast
--F. Riedelio 08:04, 19 December 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
The same problems with the gable as in the other picture. --Ermell 09:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 10:43, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Residential/farm building in Handorf (Lower Saxony), view from northeast
December 18, 2021[edit]
- Nomination: All Saints church in Otorowo, Greater Poland V., Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 20:22, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Visible chromatic aberration in the left upper side should be removed. --F. Riedelio 11:15, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination All Saints church in Otorowo, Greater Poland V., Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 20:22, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --C messier 17:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Town hall of Lwówek, Greater Poland Voivodeship, Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 20:20, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support OK. --C messier 17:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Hindola toransThis is a photo of ASI monument number I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 18:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Hindola toransThis is a photo of ASI monument number I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 18:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Perspective correction is needed. --F. Riedelio 07:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Hindola toransThis is a photo of ASI monument number I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 18:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review
CA should be removed. --Ermell 19:18, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Hindola toransThis is a photo of ASI monument number I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 18:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination German Fountain. Santiagpo. Chile --Rjcastillo 16:04, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose IMHO, insufficient DOF (why f/2.8?) --C messier 17:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Building at 6 rue Fuzies in Castres, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 07:36, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Rue Fuzies in Castres, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 07:36, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 11:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination 17 rue Francisco Ferrer in Castres, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 07:36, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
December 17, 2021[edit]
- Nomination: Lycée professionnel Jacques de Flesselles en rénovation en décembre 2021. --Benoît Prieur 18:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Perspective correction is needed and the counterweight is unfortunately blurred. Fixable? --F. Riedelio 07:37, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Parish church in Lwówek, Greater Poland Voivodeship, Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 07:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Holy Cross church in Lwówek, Greater Poland Voiv., Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 07:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --C messier 20:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
December 15, 2021[edit]
- Nomination: Church of St. Joachim in Zagórze in SosnowiecI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Stimoroll 17:36, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Top crop and lack of perspective correction, also too much saturation, correctable? --Poco a poco 07:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
I have changed as much as i was able. Please check again. --Stimoroll 18:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
This isn't enough, sorry, the top crop is a no-go for me if it stays like this. Still a bit oversaturated and detail is not the best (the red roof on the right looks pretty strange) overall even for a big file like this. --Poco a poco 12:03, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
December 14, 2021[edit]
- Nomination: Ochsenfurt: Heiligenfigur, Erzengel Michael. By User:Tilman2007 --XRay 06:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review Comment Nice composition, but it really looks too blue in the greenery and the colors in parts of the sky might also be off. -- Ikan Kekek 10:29, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
@Tilman2007: Please have a look. Thank you. --XRay 13:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination: Building at Dluga 29 in Bydgoszcz, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 05:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review
The upper left corner is unfortunately very blurred. Fixable? --F. Riedelio 08:44, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
December 13, 2021[edit]
- Nomination: Stick art is a traditional game from upper egypt, where the guys fight with a stick according to certain techniques and tricks (by Rasha Rashad Beshara Abdelmalek) --Adoscam 08:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review Comment Probably not sharp enough even for a photo of people in motion, but the name needs to be more explanatory and the categories are way off - Category:Dance of Malawi? -- Ikan Kekek 11:20, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
CommentIt is a traditional game in Upper Egypt, where guys fight with a stick using certain techniques and tricks. it is a celebration dance at weddings and other occasions in Egypt. catégorie added --User:Adoscam 12:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)</includeonly>
Comment I'm saying the filename is not descriptive enough and there is at least one category that's wrong. -- Ikan Kekek 08:43, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Comment I notice that the filename was made explanatory and the offending category was removed. However, I'm having trouble deciding whether this is a QI or not and would like for someone else to vote or express an opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 13:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
December 11, 2021[edit]
- Nomination: Aerial photographs of Tambov, Russia. --Alexander Novikov 18:09, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Perspective correction is needed (sloping horizon). --F. Riedelio 07:48, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Building at Stary Port 1-3 in Bydgoszcz, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voiv., Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 13:27, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment I marked two Dust spots and ask you to remove them. --Augustgeyler 16:56, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Done, Tournasol7 21:28, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
December 9, 2021[edit]
- Nomination: Monastery of Alcobaça, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 23:54, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Perspective correction is needed --F. Riedelio 17:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
Rules
These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.
- To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
- You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
- The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
- Using
{{support}}
or{{oppose}}
will make it easier to count your vote. - Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
- In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
- Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Oppose and Support if necessary.
- Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
- Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".
Consensual Review[edit]
File:Bosque_Encantado,_Parque_nacional_de_Garajonay,_La_Gomera,_España,_2012-12-14,_DD_12.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Enchanted Forest, Garajonay National Park, La Gomera, Spain --Poco a poco 06:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Sorry: The corners are blurred. --F. Riedelio 07:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
I see, ok, no problem, I cropped the corners --Poco a poco 12:04, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Support Fine corners, the motif in between, too. --Palauenc05 19:48, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Open_wing_Basking_of_Dichorragia_nesimachus_(Doyère,_1840)_–_Constable_(Male)_WLB_IMG_3082.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Open wing Basking of Dichorragia nesimachus (Doyère, 1840) – Constable (Male) (by Sandipoutsider) --Atudu 14:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support OK quality. --Charlesjsharp 16:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. too blurred even at 70% -- Alvesgaspar 17:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Close_wing_mud_puddling_activity_of_Papilio_polytes_Linnaeus,_1758_–_Common_Mormon.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Close wing mud puddling activity of Papilio polytes Linnaeus, 1758 – Common Mormon.jpg (by Aniruddha97350) --Atudu 13:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose something wrong with the background --Charlesjsharp 16:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree, something very wrong the image. Agressibe denoising? -- Alvesgaspar 17:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 07:23, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose overcooked --Poco a poco 18:02, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Close_wing_Philomela_form_of_Pareronia_hippia_(Fabricius,_1787)_–_Indian_Wanderer.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Close wing Philomela form of Pareronia hippia (Fabricius, 1787) – Indian Wanderer.jpg (by Aniruddha97350) --Atudu 13:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks to be in focus, but there is very little definition. May be limitation of camera/lens. --Charlesjsharp 16:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Something very wrong the image. Agressibe denoising? -- Alvesgaspar 17:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Ravenna_-_Battistero_Neoniana.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Ravenna - Battistero Neoniana --Imehling 06:48, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support A bit dark, but good for me. --Sebring12Hrs 18:20, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose It's not only dark in the shadows, the verticals are not OK. --Augustgeyler 03:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not seeing what's wrong with the verticals. Could you please explain? The shadows are somewhat noisy, though. -- Ikan Kekek 07:35, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Perhaps I am wrong, but for me it looks like the outer verticals are leaning in. So a small perspective correction might help there. --Augustgeyler 11:44, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Thanks. Looks normal to me, normal foreshortening or whatever. A little noise reduction in the shadows might be good, but I think this is acceptable for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 16:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:05, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Ferrari_250_LM_1963_-_Museo_Ferrari.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Ferrari 250 LM 1963 - Museo Ferrari --Commonists 20:39, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --V.Boldychev 09:38, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose DoF is too shallow, and there are sharpening artefacts. --A.Savin 14:47, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:00, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Yes, too small DoF. --Augustgeyler 11:49, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Handorf_Hauptstraße_07_Scheune_005_2021_06_21.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Barn in Handorf (Lower Saxony), view from south --F. Riedelio 08:50, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose Strucutreless sky; I don't like it --Hillopo2018 08:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I disagree: The sky is not the subject but the barn. The sky is therefore without structure because it is a closed cloud cover. --F. Riedelio 11:05, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support
Oppose Because of the sky, I oppose this for FP...Wait, hold on...Seriously, I don't think this is the place to oppose photos merely because you don't like days with annoying skies. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Zerlegung_einer_ausgebauten_Stahlnietenbrücke_in_Leipzig_Anger-Crottendorf_(Dia).jpg[edit]
- Nomination Oxyacetylene cutting at night to scrap an old railway bridge from 1912 in Leipzig. --Augustgeyler 01:17, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --The night rainbow 06:18, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree, sorry! The photo has too much noise and too small DOF. It seems to me that this is a scan of a slide or a paper photo. --Steindy 15:54, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Please see the decription at the file! The subject of oxy.-cutting is in focus. So why is there a DoF-Problem? --Augustgeyler 22:29, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Above 6 MPixels, excellent quality, considering the difficult lighting situation. --Smial 13:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Quality is good enough for film. Striking motif. --Argenberg 12:26, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose There is too much noise in the photo. --Fischer.H 18:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support An impressive photo. Under these conditions and with this resolution some noise is acceptable --KaiBorgeest 00:33, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support I agree with KaiBorgeest. Impressive shot, and the noise is not disturbing to me. --Lion-hearted85 16:47, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose is this a quality photo?--Commonists 13:00, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I would hesitate if this were FPC or VIC. But nor in QIC, where the criteria is solely image quality -- Alvesgaspar 21:57, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- This scan of a slide has excellent image quality. -- Smial 13:09, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. --Tagooty 06:36, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I am wondering about the complaints, there might be to much noise. There is no noise, but grain. And grain of that size is a very typical thing for photographs shot in ISO 100 reversal film. It was developed with standard time. So the grain is the same as it would be at day time. --Augustgeyler 17:36, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Agree. Please have a look at the discussion page, "Evaluation of scanned photographs on conventional film material". (I don't know how to use a permalink here) --Smial 10:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support ok for me --Christian Ferrer 21:23, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Disturbing luminance noise. --F. Riedelio 07:18, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Agree that, given the source material, this is a good quality image. --Lrkrol 15:46, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Yeriho 12:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Timetable (day 8 after nomination)[edit]
- Fri 17 Dec → Sat 25 Dec
- Sat 18 Dec → Sun 26 Dec
- Sun 19 Dec → Mon 27 Dec
- Mon 20 Dec → Tue 28 Dec
- Tue 21 Dec → Wed 29 Dec
- Wed 22 Dec → Thu 30 Dec
- Thu 23 Dec → Fri 31 Dec
- Fri 24 Dec → Sat 01 Jan
- Sat 25 Dec → Sun 02 Jan