Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
46,467 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
41,491 (89.3%) 
Undecided
  
2,644 (5.7%) 
Declined
  
2,332 (5%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Blue diadem (Hypolimnas salmacis thomensis) underside Sao Tome.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-12-18 11:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Hypolimnas salmacis thomensis (Blue diadem) underside
  • Interesting species but missing a large part of the lower wing which is supposed to be a reference. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Yes, a worn specimen, but the thin band on the hind wing is the diagnostic (Larsen) and that is clearly visible. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:12, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
Algemene R.K. Begraafplaats “Vitushof” 14-12-2021 (d.j.b.) 09.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2021-12-18 16:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Vitus-akker (2013) Memorial stone for Saint Vitus Patron of Oldehove on the Vitus field (2013) Information on the back of the memorial stone about the memorial stone.
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Landscape of the mountains in Bhutan.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
2006nishan178713 (talk) on 2021-12-18 17:12 (UTC)
Scope:
landscape of the lush green mountains in Paro, Bhutan
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image. We must add a geocoding in caption. The scope must be very precise: if possible to give the name of the mountains which are seen or of a village ... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
TWSBI Eco Füllhalter weiß B mit Kappe.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
August Geyler (talk) on 2021-12-19 23:17 (UTC)
Scope:
TWSBI Eco fountain pen – (Type: white)
Used in:
Wikidata:Q192401
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think I see 3 photos in this scope, and I have no idea how to pick one as better in scope than the others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:15, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I nominated this one because it shows all parts and in addition there is a reflection visible at the top showing some extra detail of the nib. --August Geyler (talk) 11:41, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Has more accuracy in arrangement. Shows a bit les of this reflection. --August Geyler (talk) 02:40, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
Kornwerderzand. (actm) 41.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2021-12-20 05:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Kornwerderzand - Number of machine gun casemate IV.
Open for review.
Thaisella kiosquiformis 01.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2021-12-20 07:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Thaisella kiosquiformis (Kiosque Rock Snail), shell
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 08:51, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Picus sharpei MHNT.ZOO.2010.11.162.1.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2021-12-20 08:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Picus sharpei (Iberian green woodpecker) egg
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Vraux Wegekreuz Mairie.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2021-12-20 9:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross at the town hall of Vraux, Département Marne, France.
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
African grass blue (Zizeeria knysna) male Principe.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-12-18 11:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Zizeeria knysna (African grass blue) male dorsal
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Fashion commodore (Precis pelarga) female wet season form Principe.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-12-18 12:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Precis pelarga (Fashion commodore) female wet season form dorsal
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Immaculate wood white (Leptosia nupta) Sao Tome.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-12-18 13:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Leptosia nupta (Immaculate wood white) underside
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Close wing basking position of Lethe distans Butler, 1870 – Scarce Red Forester MG 8248.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Bodhisattwa (talk) on 2021-12-20 16:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Lethe distans (Scarce Red Forester), ventral
Open for review.
Algemene R.K. Begraafplaats “Vitushof” 14-12-2021 (d.j.b.) 06.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2021-12-20 16:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Algemene R.K. Begraafplaats “Vitushof” Franciscan Sisters of Munster, Bonifatius Hospitaal Leeuwarden Tombstone of the deceased sisters. (Left.)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Bergweg tussen Andiast, Ladinas en Breil-Brigels (actm) 15.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2021-12-21 05:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Artificial lake above Andiast.
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
(Albi) A Quoi rêvent les jeunes filles - Lucien Métivet 1903.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-12-21 06:07 (UTC)
Scope:
A quoi rêvent les jeunes filles (What girls dream about) by Lucien Métivet
Open for review.
(Albi) Collégiale Saint-Salvy - Statue de sainte catherine de Sienne PalissyPM81000455.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-12-21 06:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Collégiale Saint-Salvy (Albi) - Statue of Saint Catherine of Siena‎
Open for review.
(Toulouse) L'atelier du peintre - Gabriel Durand - Musée du Vieux Toulouse inv.80.1404.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-12-21 06:14 (UTC)
Scope:
L'atelier du peintre (The painter's studio) by Gabriel Durand in Musée du Vieux Toulouse
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 10:23, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
Jodutta acraea (Acraea jodutta) male Sao Tome.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-12-21 09:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea jodutta (Jodutta acraea) male dorsal
Open for review.
Jodutta acraea (Acraea jodutta) male underside Sao Tome.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-12-21 09:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea jodutta (Jodutta acraea) male underside
Open for review.
Jodutta acraea (Acraea jodutta) female Sao Tome.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-12-21 09:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea jodutta (Jodutta acraea) female dorsal
Open for review.
Dendrocopos leucotos leucotos MHNT.ZOO.2010.11.164.2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2021-12-21 10:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Dendrocopos leucotos (museum specimens) (white-backed woodpecker) eggs
Open for review.
De grote kerk van Hindeloopen. 30-03-2021. (d.j.b) 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2021-12-21 17:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Grote Kerk (Hindeloopen). Wooden door (North side).
Open for review.
2021-12-21 Sitzung des Abgeordnetenhauses von Berlin by Sandro Halank–132.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sandro Halank (talk) on 2021-12-21 21:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Lena Kreck
Used in:
de:Senat Giffey, de:Lena Kreck, d:Q110043992
Open for review.
Hattem, Grote of Andreaskerk. 13-09-2021. (actm.) 03.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2021-12-22 05:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Hattem, Grote of Andreaskerk (commemorative plaque)
Open for review.
(Albi) Collégiale Saint-Salvy - Statue de saint Laurent PalissyPM81000442.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-12-22 06:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Collégiale Saint-Salvy (Albi) - Statue of St. Lawrence

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 07:00, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
(Toulouse) Un gigot Théodule Ribot - Amiens, musée de Picardie.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-12-22 06:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Un gigot (A leg) by Augustin Théodule Ribot in Musée de Picardie, Amiens.
Open for review.
(Toulouse) Dent de lion percée - Grotte Duruthy - Musée de Toulouse MHNT.PRE2010.0.13.3.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-12-22 06:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Cave lion canine (Panthera spelaea) Pierced to be worn as an ornament in Duruthy cave
Open for review.
Mactra stultorum 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2021-12-22 06:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Mactra stultorum ( Rayed Trough Shell), left valve
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 09:18, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
Large spotted acraea (Acraea zetes anobonna) Sao Tome.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-12-22 08:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea zetes anobonna (Large spotted acraea) dorsal
Open for review.
Large spotted acraea (Acraea zetes anobonna) underside Sao Tome.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-12-22 08:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea zetes anobonna (Large spotted acraea) underside
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful & used. But the branches are disturbing.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
Dark grass blue (Zizina antanossa) underside Principe.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-12-22 08:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Zizina antanossa (Dark grass blue) underside
Open for review.
Dryocopus martius pinetorum MHNT.ZOO.2010.11.164.6.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2021-12-22 09:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Dryocopus martius (museum specimens) (black woodpecker) eggs
Open for review.
Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (d.j.b.) 09.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2021-12-22 16:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Terp (Hegebeintum): Memorial plaque in the road to the church of Petrus Velsen van Nijsten (1694-1723). Child of Bartholomeus van Nijsten and Margaretha Huygh on the path to the church.

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
Trier Ruländer Hof Hieronymus Jaegen.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2021-12-22 18:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Commemorative plaque for Hieronymus Jaegen at Ruländer Hof in Trier.
Open for review.
Cooper's hawk in Prospect Park (22513).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rhododendrites talk |  on 2021-12-22 20:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Accipiter cooperii (Cooper's hawk) (juvenile)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as an FP I will assume it's the best as I'm not going through 300+ images. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
House sparrows in CP (60060).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Rhododendrites talk |  on 2021-12-22 20:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Passer domesticus (pairs) (house sparrow)
Reason:
I am making an assumption that because we have the category "Passer domesticus (pairs)", it would qualify for VI? — Rhododendrites talk |  20:32, 22 December 2021 (UTC) -- — Rhododendrites talk[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Basically it is quite true we can label this image, but this image is more useful for VI because there are more informative characters in ornithology. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Yes I agree. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
Ring-billed gull in Red Hook (42799).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Rhododendrites talk |  on 2021-12-22 20:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Larus delawarensis (ring-billed gull)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This image looks very good to me. But who will, in conscience, delve into all the categories to compare? This type of situation requires some sorting work by the applicant ... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Tricky, but too much work! Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
Russisch-orthodox klooster (Hemelum). 20-07-2020. (actm.) 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2021-12-23 05:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Russisch orthodox klooster (Hemelum) Wooden cross on the side wall of the monastery.
Open for review.
(Albi) Collégiale Saint-Salvy - Orgue du choeur.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-12-23 06:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Collégiale Saint-Salvy (Albi) - Choir organ.
Open for review.
(Lavaur) Etude des bords de Garonne depuis le port Viguerie Henri Rachou.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-12-23 06:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Etude des bords de Garonne depuis le port Viguerie (Study of the banks of the Garonne from the port Viguerie) by Henri Rachou
Open for review.
Marumba cristata cristata MHNT CUT 2010 0 490 Himachal Pradesh female dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-12-23 06:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Marumba cristata specimen female dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 07:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
Xerotricha conspurcata 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2021-12-23 07:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Xerotricha conspurcata, shell
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 07:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
Picoides tridactylus MHNT.ZOO.2010.11.164.12.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2021-12-23 07:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Picoides tridactylus (museum specimens) (Eurasian three-toed woodpecker) eggs
Open for review.
Trier Quant Ölgemälde 1921.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2021-12-23 09:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Oil painting (1921) by Fritz Quant: View of Trier with "Kaiser-Wilhelm-Brücke" and "Martinsmühle".
Open for review.
Saulny Wegekreuz Rue de Briey.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2021-12-23 09:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross in in Saulny (France), 5, Rue de Briey.
Open for review.
Lucia widow (Palpopleura lucia) male Principe.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-12-23 17:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Palpopleura lucia (Lucia widow) male lateral view
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful & used. There are others with similar lateral view but this one has the best quality. --GRDN711 (talk) 04:05, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
Soldier commodore (Junonia terea) female Principe.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-12-23 17:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Junonia terea (Soldier commodore) female dorsal
Reason:
the ssp on the island is not established -- Charlesjsharp (talk)
Open for review.
Algemene R.K. Begraafplaats “Vitushof” 14-12-2021 (d.j.b.) 03.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2021-12-23 17:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Algemene R.K. Begraafplaats “Vitushof” Franciscan Sisters of Munster, Bonifatius Hospitaal Leeuwarden. Crucifix.
Open for review.
Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam. (actm.) 04.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2021-12-24 05:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Young leaves of a Gunnera manicata Brazilian giant-rhubarb.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The scope is bad. It should point us to the subject shown not on Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam.

Image is also in the species category, so choose that route. But the category of the species is bloated. You have to isolate the subject in a more relevant category like young leaves that you can create by adding images of young leaves: there are several of them. In this case the scope is relevant. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
(Toulouse) Un gigot Théodule Ribot - La Tronche, musée Hebert (Dépot Orsay).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-12-24 06:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Un gigot (A leg of lamb) by Augustin Théodule Ribot in La Tronche, musée Hebert.
Open for review.
(Toulouse) Femme au fauteuil bleu (1855) Gabriel Durand.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-12-24 06:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Femme au fauteuil bleus by Gabriel Durand
Open for review.
Marumba cristata cristata MHNT CUT 2010 0 490 Himachal Pradesh female ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-12-24 06:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Marumba cristata specimen female ventral
Open for review.
Spiny-backed orb-weaver (Gasteracantha sanguinolenta) female dorsal Principe.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-12-23 22:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Gasteracantha sanguinolenta (Spiny-backed orb-weaver) female dorsal
Reason:
Images from A Sharp Eye on wildlife photography: São Tomé and Príncipe. Turn to page 30 for a scarcely believable fact about parrotfish you can use to entertain the kids over the holidays. I wish these two were higher technical FP quality as they are two of my favourites from this year. Happy Christmas/Happy holidays to all at VIC. Charles -- Charlesjsharp (talk)
Open for review.
Spiny-backed orb-weaver (Gasteracantha sanguinolenta) female ventral Principe.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-12-23 22:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Gasteracantha sanguinolenta (Spiny-backed orb-weaver) female ventral
Open for review.
Dendrocopos medius MHNT.ZOO.2010.11.164.13.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2021-12-24 10:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Dendrocoptes medius (museum specimens) (middle spotted woodpecker) eggs
Open for review.
Algemene R.K. Begraafplaats “Vitushof” 14-12-2021 (d.j.b.) 04.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2021-12-24 18:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Algemene R.K. Begraafplaats “Vitushof” Franciscan Sisters of Munster, Bonifatius Hospitaal Leeuwarden Tombstone of the deceased sisters. (Right.)
Open for review.
Ramallah woman 15029v.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Naouk (talk) on 2021-12-24 18:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Palestinian clothing
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Way too broad a category. Please focus the scope more. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:55, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
Russisch-orthodox klooster (Hemelum). 20-07-2020. (actm.) 04.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2021-12-25 05:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Russisch orthodox klooster (Hemelum) religious image on a canvas behind a window of the monastery.
Open for review.
(Albi) A quoi rêvent les jeunes filles - Lucien Métivet 1903 lithographie.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-12-25 05:47 (UTC)
Scope:
A quoi rêvent les jeunes filles (What girls dream about) by Lucien Métivet - lithography
Open for review.
(Lavaur) Etude des bords de Garonne avec la pile du vieux pont couvert de la Daurade - Henri Rachou.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-12-25 05:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Etude des bords de Garonne avec la pile du vieux pont couvert de la Daurade (Study of the banks of the Garonne with the stack of the old covered bridge of the Daurade) by Henri Rachou
Open for review.
Orecta fruhstorferi MHNT CUT 2010 0 492 Santa Maria Brasilia, Bresil male dorsal.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-12-25 05:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Orecta fruhstorferi specimen male dorsal
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

African grass blue (Zizeeria knysna) underside[edit]

   
African grass blue (Zizeeria knysna) underside.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-11-15 23:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Zizeeria knysna (African grass blue) ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 02:58, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 05:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
African grass blue (Zizeeria knysna) underside Principe 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-12-18 11:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Zizeeria knysna (African grass blue) underside

Symbol support vote.svg Support Much better indeed. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.