This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I was in the midst of the Bustos town fiesta festival when I chanced to discover this almost hidden or by the side Monument; Thanks for the message; in Commons:Derivative works, I ponder that the logo and seal is part of the Cultural heritage, monuments and memorials in Bulacan or in the Philippines emanating from the Tourism aspect for the site is 100 years marker and landmark of the town. No objection to the deletion, though.--Judgefloro (talk) 04:43, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Thanks for your message and good morning; I looked at the photos of the Wikipedia Takes Manila for example this 2012 Image of the Public Market 6 photos taken by this Project in the Category; this market which is now reconstructed, hence, I presume that the photos of the facade and interior are well within the Philippine projects; I just passed by this place to hear mass at the Church near this market; at any rate, I have no objection to the deletion, Category:Santa Ana Public Market, Manila includes 6 photos of the same facade by the the Wikipedia Takes Manila
sincerely --Judgefloro 19:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC) (talk)
Deleted: most, kept two as DM. --Jcb (talk) 14:12, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These photos include highly educational, relevant and landmark images of Category:By-pass (roads) in the Philippines; Thanks for your message, and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; I respectfully submit the following reasons, supported by news and DPWH data and information on this Bypass Road; a) 9.60-kilometer long road is a Diversion or Bypass that cuts short the travel from Baliuag to Pulilan: to wit: all the SUV or vans going to Dau or San Fernando Pampanga are now passing this instead of the heavy traffic roads of Pulilan Regional Road to NLEx or the San Simon Exit; b) all the vehicles passing Daang Maharlika and suffering the heavy or almost standstill traffic in Tarcan junction, and in Jollibee Pulilan Junction to go to NLEx or Pulilan town proper, will Bypass this Road; c) this is a landmark and tourist attraction road; that is, it is bikers friendly as your can see the white marked bicycle lanes for tourists and Lay-by or rest areas; d) the amount spent for this Bypass is PHP509.60 million to P 1 Billion and finished in record time; e) in Wikimedia Commons, the photos are very educational since the Categories delineates the metes and bounds of the architecture of this work; I took so much enough photos since the road covers 2 barangays of Baliuag and 5 Barangays of Pulilan; here are the news proofs of notability of these photos; in fact Secretary Villar and Pulilan Mayor Maritz Ochoa inaugurated this road with Historical markers I still am looking for as this was headline news in our TVs: Pulilan-Baliuag diversion road The 9.60-kilometer long road begins at Pulilan-Calumpit road in Tibag, Pulilan and ends in Daang Maharlika in Tarcan in Baliuag, Bulacan with cost of PHP509.60 million - Network Development Construction of By-Passes (Pulilan-Baliuag, Bulacan Diversion Roads - Row) very sincerly yours, Judgefloro 07:36, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Comment I only agree with you to a certain extent. Some of the images uploaded are just taken on the same road but at different points. The distance between these points doesn't really make anything more visible (i.e. distance between photos taken are too close). Hope you understand my POV. 大诺史 (talk) 15:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Although Keep some of the images of the road since it is pretty notable. Markoolio97 (talk) 03:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Exhaustive argument and discussion on notability
Rejoinder
Exhaustive argument and discussion on the notability, landmark, educational, engineering and Philippine record on roads, never before done in past President's since Emilio Aguinaldo to Aquino, Jr. Category:Pulilan-Baliuag Diversion Road
With all due respect, I am hereby submitting the following, in line with the Philosophy of Wikimedia Commons of sharing photos for Wisdom, inter alia, to wit:
Admittedly, in Marikina and Antipolo, Bicycle lanes are innovations to ease traffic by former Mayor Bayani Fernando; in Lumban, there is only one Lay-by but here in Pulilan-Baliuag Diversion Road, not only from start to finish of the 9.6 kilometers consting P 506 million finished in record less than 2 years, Bicycle lanes and/or with Lay-by or Category Rest areas do line up both side of the by-pass road from Barangay Tarcan in Maharlika Highway to Barangay Tibag in Pulilan Regiona Road, both are notable Article of Wikipedia; while a political critic would argue such is waste of Tax money, still from the view of Secretary Villar of DPWH, Biker friendly By pass road was conceived due to the Tourist requirements of Pulilan as Kneeling Carabao Festival capital of the Philippines and Baliuag as Buntal Hat Festival capital of Luzon;
Economic savings due to reduction of travel from Baliuag to Pulilan vice versa from 1 1/2 hours to 20 minutes
There are 3 modes of travel between these 2 towns: a) via the traffic conjestion of Jollibee Cutcut Junction and during 2 market days a week traffic standstill in Pulilan Regional Road ad Cut cut to Poblacion to reach NLEx; b) UV express vans from SM Baliuag and/or Poblacion to NLEX via i) San Simon exit or ii) Pulilan exit, to reach Dau Mabalacat of San Fernando Pampanga, takes 1 hour; iii) Travellers from MacAthur Highway from Santa Rita, Guiguinto NLEx and Cabanatuan to Baliuag travelers to reach NLEx need not face the traffic to reach Pulilan NLEx or Baliuag and Pulilan Town Proper due to savings of time reduced to 20 minutes because of this By pass road;
Marvel and first in Engineering both Civil, mechanical and electrical including the Geodetic aspect vis-a-vis the Tiqui Builders advanced Construction or roads
advanced Cement and enforcement mechanisms of the By pass
I claim that I have not ever seen Philippine roads, except in Duterte's presidency, that cement road no longer need asphalt covering like in NLEx, due to strong quality of Eagles and Republic cement mixed with secret ingredients and with strong steel to withstand the pressures of even 20 wheeler trucks; however, this rainy season, they do not allow trucks and buses to pass to make strong the just inaugurated road but later they can pass;
How I photographed the roads, namely the numbers of photos needed to catch the Category:Paddy fields in Bulacan covering 7 Barangays and the Bicycle lanes and/or with Lay-by or Category Rest areas
I hired a tricyle paying $6 or about 300 pesos to catch the scenery and roads centering on the Bicycle lanes and/or with Lay-by or Category Rest areas: this is 9.6 kilometers and about 25 photos per Barangay of the entire route is modest enough having in mind 3 birds with one stone, namely, 7 barangays, 7 Paddy fields, 7 grasslands, a creek and PBB Bridge; one my ponder that the roads are almost empty of vehicles and they look all the same; but not, since this Bypass has just been opened; one can imagine if may vehicles pass this, then it would enhance the beauty of the photos; Bypass begins at Pulilan-Calumpit road in Tibag, Pulilan and ends in Daang Maharlika in Tarcan in Baliuag, Bulacan with cost of PHP509.60 million - Network Development Construction of By-Passes (Pulilan-Baliuag, Bulacan Diversion Roads - Row) in BarangaysDulong Malabon 14°55'28"N 120°48'38"E Tibag 14°54'23"N 120°49'30"E Inaon 14°56'30"N 120°49'35"E Balatong 14°56'10"N 120°50'33"E Peñabatan 14.9175, 120.8552 Pulilan, Bulacan interconnecting with BarangaysMatangtubig 14°57'3"N 120°52'10"E Tarcan 14°55'57"N 120°53'0"E Baliuag, Bulacan, BulacanPhilippine highway network;
A great contribution to Category Real Estate in the Philippines and reduction of Corruption in Public Works due to Jump of Category:Real estate in the Philippines Real Estate prices of mere ricelands without value to inevitable conversion of these lands to Commercial estates for Housing
This project did pop up from nowhere and nobody was notified before the project started, taking into surprise the Real Estate sector; just imagine from not even P 50 per sq. meter, the price of ALL ricelands passed by this Bypass jumped to about a conservative P 3,000 per square meter; deep inside this fact, many were caught unaware of this Real Estate boom done by this Bypass road; without fear, I predict that Villas and Camellas of Villar and others like those I photographed in Bulacan and Nueva Ecija and Laguna, will sprout like mushroom around this Bypass road;
Finally, an Impossible made possible
from paddy fields with creeks, so naive and almost impossible for roads to be constructed upon due to weak and watery foundation
Sec. Villar's genius of Engineering and Architecture made a First in Philippine road history
IN FINE, I respectfully submit that: the same thing happens in Pan-Philippine highway section from Junction Pulilan Cut-cut to Junction Sampaloc, San Rafael: repeated road or Highway works and reblockings failed to correct the once paddy fields and watery foundation resulting to Forever road works; but here in Bypass road, the Marvel of Advance Engineering by Tiqui Construction, and state of the art Engineering coupled with Secret cement additives with strong steel, made this P 506 million Bypass a legacy of the DPWH to Philippine Engineering and Science;
Valued images of Landmark Bypass Road
IN FINE II, not even 1 photo of the landmark Bypass road can justly be found in Commons and internet but here; allow me to subjectively and objectively express my philosophy of sharing wisdom to the future researchers and generaration: unlike other Internet sites, Commons does not resize the photos and the Categories are well delineated to allow readers to easily find the photos; when one opens Category:Cebu CityCategory:Davao City and the entire Visayas and Mindanao in Commons, one cannot find high quality picture as I did for Luzon 18 provinces; I never concentrated just on Historical Markers or Churches but also on broad overcompassing Categories of Roads, Schools, Buildings, and name them all; not only hard work but huge expenses just to fulfil the Sharing of Wisdom via Commons photos to future generations; many of my photos are intact even if Churches and other buildings are destroyed reconstructed and gone; if the photos of these Bypass roads are gone, by deletion, then, future generations will for sure loose the opportunity to know and learn about the above considerations they can only find in Commons, nowhere else, and for free to the public domain without any considerations whatsoever, very sincerely, Respectfully submitted Judgefloro 09:39, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. As per COM:PS: Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. = meaning we don't need a massive collection of nearly duplicate images. We have told Judgefloro/Ramon FVelasquez many times in the past to be more selective when uploading. And no need to give a long sermon on the notability of the road, that is irrelevant to the number of needless images. P 1 9 9✉ 13:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Good morning from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; thanks for your message;
With all due respect, I am submitting here the legal ramifications on the matter, to wit:
Express permission to photograph any and all subjects objects of Rizal Park was granted to herein photographer editor by the Head of the Visitor Centre of Rizal Park, as evidenced by the so a) many photos of the said Visitor Office of the Park including the Tourist Map Category:Tourist map of Rizal Park;
Category:Rizal Park Visitor's Center the head explained to me each and every numbers corresponding to the places of the tourist spots of the park, including the subject Sentinel of Freedom or Lapu-Lapu monument which is now the property of the Government; b) she assisted me in the photography of the Park's Tourism information center and even pointed to the bust of Jose Rizal for me to take photo of;
All my photos fall within the Express exceptions provided by the Copyright law of the Philippines, thusly: "xxx On the other hand, works not protected by the copyright law are (1) unprotected subject matter and (2) works of the government.xxx Works of the Government On the other hand, no copyright shall be applied in any work of the Government of the Philippines. xxx Limitations on Copyright The following acts shall not constitute infringement of copyright: The use of a work under the direction or control of the government or other institutions for the purpose of informing and public. It must also be compatible with fair use. xxx Category:Colossal brass statue-monument of Lapu-Lapu (Sentinel of Freedom), Rizal Park Fair Use A fair use, in its most general sense, is the act of copying of copyrighted materials done for purposes such as commenting, criticizing, or parodying a copyrighted work without the permission from the copyright owner. It is used as a defense under copyright infringement. xxx Reproduction of Published Work Under Subsection 187.1 of the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines,[4] the reproduction of a published work shall be permitted without the owner's authorization given that the reproduction was made for research purposes.xxx
In fact, everyone is doing Selfie and many photographers like me do take millions of photos of these Tourist landmark sport; Most respectfully submitted, and very sincerely Judgefloro 02:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
@Judgefloro: First they are works of the respective sculptors even if commissionned (which remains to be proved). Concerning the Sentinel of Freedom monument it has been founded by the Korea Freedom League so it can hardly be a Pinoy Government work. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:41, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If all of the above files are deleted, deleting admin should consider nuking all of the uploads under COM:FOP Philippines as they are taken by the same person within the same area. 大诺史 (talk) 05:34, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to differ in the application, interpretation of the cited Article Sec. 172 of the IP Code of the Philippines, and other related provisions, for the following reasons: in Statutory construction, the spirit and intent of the Copyright law in its related provisions should be looked into so as not to make absurd the Section; in this case the Rizal Park administration, that is Rizal Parks Develoment Committed through the Head of the Visitors Office, paid all the labors and works of the architect or sculptors, and all the foreman and manual laborers to build in in Agrifinal Circle; the same can be said of all thousands works now owned or transferred to the Government of the Philippines; as in our Government, the Rizal Park Board owns as Corporate entity all the properties of the Park irrespective of who crafted or built the church; in fact a Park cannot be created and the Attractions or Tourist spots thereat cannot be exposed to Public domain if the architect, laborers and lot owner will not transfer title to the Park and Government; this is the difference between the moral rights of the Copyright holder and one who lost all his rights when he is paid his job or works by Board or Committed of the Park; hence, the Visitors Center and Committee has control and jurisdiction over the Park and sculptures; I respectfully submit this Rejoinder, for this is a National Cultural Treasure as declared by Law and even evidence by the Historical Markers, and by the Declaration List of National Cultural Treasures in the PhilippinesRizal Monument declared a National Cultural Treasure Under Philippine Law, to wit, REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10066 should be read with the Philippine Copyright Law; and all the Tourist spots in the Tourist Map of Rizal Park including the Category:Soul Waves - Filipino-Korean Soldier Monumentincluded in the given Map by the Visitor's Center fall within the Express Exception to FOP, hence the Lost Rights of Sculptors, inter alia, that is all now of the Public Domain, because of being Government Property; here with Express Permission of the Head of the Visitors Center; I respectfully submit this Rejoinder, References
Sculptor is Filipino Juan Sajid Imao who was paid, and lost all his rights since this work is upon Bilateral Relations of Korea and Philippines; The hard evidence to Donations or Full transfer to Rizal Park, National Government are the 2 Historical Markers Monuments that state so and the name of the Sculptor Juan Sajid Imao is engraved therein; for this matters, I respectfully submit that the same 3 Sculptures including Lapu-lapu monument are of the Public Domain of the Government of the Philippines expressly falling with the Exceptions of the Copyrright Law as I respectfully underscore the Express Assistance and Permission to photo by the Management of Rizal Park Tourist Visitor Center, very sincerely Judgefloro 04:48, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
References of the Filipino Sculptor and Donation are the marker and marker 2 very sincerely Judgefloro 04:50, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Agree with the deletion of the rest of the images given rule on FOP and that most, if not all, of these artwork's authors (esp. Jose M. Mendoza, author of Bisig) are still living which means not suitable for PD-Philippines. Markoolio97 (talk) 03:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the following images since the artwork is not the main focus of the image but the surrounding Agrifina Circle Markoolio97 (talk) 03:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Thanks for your message and Good Afternoon from hereat Cloudy Bulacan Philippines due to LPA; please allow me to let the researchers consider that Laborers or Paid Workers and not artist, work per piece or per day with minimum daily wages paid by Employers, here, the University Board; Love arts are scattered all over the Philippines; and here in my country, no artist will execute a work in the streets or outside the Schools; I ♥ love Landmark are manufactured by petty workers, hence, no Moral Value or rights exist, hence outside the scope of Copyrights law; at any rate, I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons in this matter; Very very sincerelyJudgefloro 09:59, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
It isn't up to you to say "manufactured by petty workers, hence, no Moral Value or rights exist", it is the copyright law of the country (Philippines) which follows the law of the U.S.. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Unsure With regards to current standing of the Philippines on FOP, I agree yet the subject of the image is a mass-produced generic work and does not violate the Commons:Threshold_of_originality rule, thus the subject having no copyright. Markoolio97 (talk) 01:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
{{Pd-ineligible}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markoolio97 (talk • contribs) 01:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: unclear TOO in the Philippines. --Sebari– aka Srittau (talk) 13:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Thanks for your message and good afternoon from hereat very cloudy Bulacan province in Philippines; with due respect, this Events place was just painted and restored from the original dilapidated, haunted and eerie Old Mansion of Calamba; if I am not mistaken, this house including the sculptures dates before WWII, or less than 100 years old; hence the input category of Category:Old houses in Laguna; at any rate, I respectfully remain neutral in the sound discretion of editors of Commons on this matter, very very sincerely Judgefloro 07:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep This might apply for PD-Philippines tag given that the subject of the images are examples of old-style of architecture (around early 1900 to late 1960) Markoolio97 (talk) 02:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC) {{PD-Philippines}}[reply]
Comment Looks to be rather generic mass-produced garden fountain and decoration figures. Many of the photos don't even show the "sculptures". How old is the building? If old enough to not be a FOP concern, I don't think a fresh coat of paint changes the status. (I'd lean keep but I'm not familiar with the history of the building nor details of Philippines copyright.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Here are a few examples of similar architecture reference 1, reference 2. I have been looking on the subject and references. and there are some hints that point to the subject being a recently-built structure that was designed to look similar to the old style of houses.This image shows a set of glass doors in the upper level of the house which continues through the windowed portion of the house, an uncanny and not period-correct design. The stone design on the left also looks artificial and attached only and not period-correct. Apart from these, there are not enough information available to correctly date the structure. Markoolio97 (talk) 01:40, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have done a quick look in Google Earth and the structure is visible as of the earliest satellite image, April 25, 2004. It also shows that the place had been renovated sometime between March and October 2015 which might explain the uncanny and out-of-period design of the place. I'm going for keep (see above). Markoolio97 (talk) 06:02, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: kept most, deleted a few where the sculpture or fountain were a clear focus. --Sebari– aka Srittau (talk) 13:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Thanks for your message and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines amid stormy weather; with all due respect, I am submitting my following thoughts and discussions on this matter: the photos are not only valued images, but first in the internet, never seen yet, since Calauan is a tourist place or visitor attraction, in fact these 3 days in all front pages and TV headlines due to the Landmark Calauan MayorAntonio Sanchez case:
h) It takes about 6 hours from my place at Bulacan to reach these Barangays and 6 hours to travel home; the cost of travel and hiring vehicles in the photography amount to about P 1,500, hence, it is submitted that these valued very notable photos are not only rare but treasures for future generations of the public domain in Wikimedia Commons in line with the Philosophy of its founders - sharing of Wisdom; respectfully submitted and very sincerely Judgefloro 10:17, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Additional argument, discussion and submissions on the issue of notablility and sufficiency of the number of photos
1) Sitios, puroks and villages compose the Category:Barangays of Calauan, Laguna; like before particularly when I was starting here in Commons about 2010 to 2015, I could take specific photos of Health Centers, Barangay Halls, even Chapels and Schools, among other interesting points; I could have taken more tourist spots like falls and Historical markers, but they are too far and I would spend hours to reach them in addition to the long 6 hours to reach Laguna from Bulacan, and 6 hours to be back leaving only 2 hours for photography;
2) The most important problem of my photography is that most of the Barangays are critical or dangerous areas;
3) Hence, I opted to stay inside the vehicle like jeep or tricycle hired to take photos of these Sitios, puroks and villages via Road photography;
4) I beg to disagree on the duplication of photos: because for example, Barangay Mabacan, Calauan is too large a barangay with about 7 Sitios, puroks and villages;
5) The going to or North photos capture only some of the :Sitios, puroks and villages; and the going back or South photos also capture only some of the Sitios, puroks and villages but and but, the scenery is totally different;
6) In Category:Salvacion and San Agustin, Pangasinan 8 December 2015, while I was taking photos while walking when I stepped down of the tricycle, I was locked down in the Barangay Hall and arrested to the Police station; I was asked to sign a waiver that I have no complaint against my detention; I failed to Google this critical area only to have found that Taguinod brothers were shot in Barangay San Agustin;
6) The subject photos for requested deletion are Highly valued images of the Sites which caught International, Global and Philippine Headlines attentions in 1993 and these Weeks;
7) Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murderAntonio Sanchez (politician) Site of the Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murder-rape is Km. 74 Brgy. Balayhangin Calauan Laguna 14°7'53"N 121°18'44"E along Category:Calauan Poblacion-Victoria RoadBarangayBalayhangin, Calauan, Laguna 14.1298, 121.3164 Calauan,_Laguna and List of barangays in Laguna (province)BarangayMabacan, Calauan, Laguna 14.1344, 121.2885 Calauan,_Laguna and Barangay and Erais Farm 30-hectare farm in Santo Tomas, Calauan, Laguna 14.1711, 121.3367 Calauan, Laguna Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road (Silangan-Lamot 1-Lamot 2-Santo Tomas-Dayap, Calauan & Masapang, Victoria) from Victoria (Masapang) Duck Junction Calauan - VictoriaRoad Calauan-Victoria Road Erais Farm Site of Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murder (Sitio Paputok, Kilometro 74, Mabacan, Imok, Balayhangin & Erais Farm, Santo Tomas & Lamot 2, Calauan, Laguna) Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murderAntonio Sanchez (politician)People vs. Antonio Sanchez, et al xxx"'The next destination was a sugarcane field in Sitio Paputok, Kilometro 74 of Barangay Mabacan. It was here that Luis announced that it’s time for the group to feast on Eileen (the exact words of Luis were “Turbohin na rin natin ang tinurbo ni Boss”)." xxx " Both vehicles then headed for Erais Farm situated in Barangay Curba, owned by the Mayor." xxx "The next destination was a sugarcane field in Sitio Paputok, Kilometro 74 of Barangay Mabacan." 'xxx a dead female loaded inside a Tamaraw van was found in Barangay Mabacan." " a card gambler was able to retrieve a pair of white shorts lying near the national highway in Barangay Balayhangin. In the morning of June 30, 1993, the Mayor, with some companions, jogged towards the direction of Barangay Mabacan and at the same time inquired from residents whether they noticed anything unusual on the night of June 28, 1993. A certain “Mang Torio” told the Mayor that he found a pair of “maong” pants lying at the side of the road but left if there. After inspecting the dirty “maong” pants, the Mayor instructed Mang Torio to keep the pants as the former will send someone back to pick it up."
7a) I respectfully appeal and with due respect submit my humble thoughts and reply on these issues, very sincerely Judgefloro 06:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Google Streemaps-like photos. I certainly wouldn't encourage anyone to make photos like these, and some photos are certainly not necessary, but I don't want to make that decision, since we'd keep a sizeable amount. If someone wants to nominate individual photos, feel free to. --Sebari– aka Srittau (talk) 16:05, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Functus officio - the photos were educational advertisements inviting learners to be interested in Tourism of the Philippine for the specific events therein mentioned - as tarpaulin advertisement billboards, they are very informative and educational; but now they are merely remains of the past and were removed after the occasions; even if I consistently objected to deletions of photos vis-à-vis the 4 year Philippines and Commons - US Jurisprudence on Extinctive prescription, I have no objection to the deletion of these already used photos based on the foregoing considerations Judgefloro (talk) 06:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:15, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No objection to the deletion and Maraming Salamat po sa inyong pagtangkilik at paglilinis ng puspusan sa aking mga Road and Landscapes pictures; in my anglebyangle walking photography of road and overpasses, I am really at a loss when I gaze at the sun and the views thereunder; I could not keep my hand careful in too many photos; I had a trauma lately when Taal Exploded: you know - why should I have not taken so many pictures of Category:Agoncillo, Batangas and Category:San Nicolas, Batangas - they were - are annihilated and obliterated almost by Category:2020 Taal Volcano eruptions; I would like to take photos of the NLEX from Guiguinto to Balintawak, but even my sibling has 5 cars, he has no jeepney without glasses; I was told that all vehicles must close their windows; I do not like to take photos with the car or bus or truck glasses blocking my camera; I also wanted to take the Skyway, but they would not permit yet the 400 cc motors; just telling my storytale ... sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I was at a loss in searching for the jurisdictional boundaries of Caloocan barangays, and after asking people, I found this Tarpaulin : sayin Barangay 21 a) it is required by law DPWH and LGUs should post notices on public places regarding i) amount, source, beginning and finishing of project b) and of course the winning bidder, to tell people, file Graft case if there is ghost, white elephant projects or road to neverland; well of course, the handsome politicians smile; I asked so many trike drivers, why? they could not answer correctly - pampapogi, level up, for the next election, I said no: the correct song is: they are very very very happy jumping with ecstasy for they will be richer, and it is one way of winning the lotto;
Off-topic lecture on tarpaulins
when I was in Br. 73, RTC, Malabon, Fiscal now Retired Judge Judge Edmundo T. Acuña, Regional Trial Court, Caloocan City, Branch 123 WHEREFORE, respondent Judge Edmundo T. Acuña is found GUILTY of impropriety and is REPRIMANDED therefor. He is STERNLY WARNED that the repetition of the same or similar act shall be dealt with more severely.; he repeatedly told me that my arch enemy Br. 72, is bragging of winning Sweepstatkes, and even had a certificate; I told Judge Ed, the crying Judge of Calokohan City, when in only son Ed at age 24 died of aneurysm and after finishing Law and passing the Bar exams; He could not accuse me of Cursing since As Philippine Angel of Death, I told him repeatedly, Don't be afraid, I won't hurt you! but Mark my work, they will regret it! (taking my robes, gavel and golden throne Br. 73); he confessed that my suspension was born and cooked at Malabon Canteen, which with all court salas except mine was totally burned exactly on 2000 July a year after I was suspended for 69 months; he also confessed that he encountered many pera pira temptations; he asked me to pray for him;
I write this tale of the reason why the Law on procurement, now requires the tarpaulin announcement of transparency; hence I submit the matter of deletion to the sound judgment of the Commons Community
I'm afraid this is too redundant already to related images in the category you mentioned. Also this is COM:NOTUSED. JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.) 05:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Rejoinder and good point: I always wanted to take photos of interiors of very important Parish Churches with open lights; this only happens during Sundays; more often, when I arrive in Churches from Batangas to Isabela, most Churches are closed and if open their ligths are not open; so, if my itinerary is near the place, I would drop by the Church again; my main problem is the exact time of the Mass beginning or ending; more often than not, Mass schedules are posted poorly and erased in time, except those by Jollibee or Malayan Insurance; hence, I did file a good comment on the Mass schedule, for I think it is the only one remaining; Category:Mass schedules in France has only 20 photos and most are poorly built; here, when Parish Priests are transferred, Mass schedules are changed, and I had to get them ... submitted to the sound discretion of the Commons Community sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 07:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted per nomination. --P 1 9 9✉ 20:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
A set of redundant images. See COM:SPAM and COM:NOTUSED. Uploader has been notified to be more selective in their uploads. Only 2 or 3 images for each person or child depicted is enough (those that I didn't nominate).
Good argument and discussion: My photos used by International public domain I took time to search them in Google, since I accidentally saw when browsing, that many of my photos are and were used continously by International books, magazines and newspapers inter alia; and no one could guess, what picture of the 1.7 million files they would use; so, as many editors here listened to me, I did ask often: why should we or they or anyone prevent the Public Domain World Planet from being choosy, weird and or ignorant of the good or better photos that they should use?
And I desire to UNDERSCORE my Lamentation like that of Jeremiah, why why and why did I not put in Commons floods of Photos of the ERASED Annihilated Category:San Nicolas, Batangas and Category:Agoncillo, Batangas and nearby almost obliterated Towns due to Taal Explotion?
IN FINE here, a) I desire to quote here what Justice Category:Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. said to console me 36 hours of my no-sleep on July 20-22, 1999, Longest Suspension of a Judge in World History: "She was appointed by Cory, but she just sits down reading Briefs ... she did not experienced what I and many Trial Judges had ... I went home Sats and Sundays bringing volumes of Transcripts ... !" She is the Ponente who Signed your Suspension ... if only Category:Andres Narvasa had not retired at 70 ... I repeatedly told CJ Davide my Cebuano ... "It would be a feather on your cap if you can put Floro and Category:Arturo Brion the husband of my seatmate classmate Tonette Brion ... b) It is utterly different when you go to the field of great dangers, take photos of villages for 4 hours, and travel from Bulacan to Pangasinan or Isabela, Ilocos Sur or Batangas for 16 hours and then sit down to edit and upload vis-a-vis, sitting down and Putting Nominations for Deletions; b) perhaps, the Inclusionary Philosphy of many here is not shared by some, and this is the heart of Commons which is Not Censored; c) It is just on what side of the coin you are, or were, or did change habits as in FOP and Com Spam; d) I am ahead of my time, I am not of this world, and ergo, I leave the matter to the sound discretion of the Commons Community; sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 07:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is not redundant at all. Thank you, Judgefloro, for your work and your licensing, and sorry you have to deal with deletionists. -- Tuválkin✉✇ 20:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
JWilz12345: The photograpger/uploader here is a judge. I’m sure he’s thankful for your input about his possible overlook of the laws of his country. Now, where’s that gavel again? -- Tuválkin✉✇ 04:37, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Tuvalkin: I'm from the Philippines too. While photography of people is not restricted, it is a common practice here to ask for parental consent before sharing images of children online. Nevertheless these can be considered as "COM:Non-copyright restrictions". Although he is a judge, I see a concern on some of his comments on various FOP-related discussions (including what seems to be an online threat to the people of Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines), which I have posted on Commons:Village pump#Some problematic comments of Judgefloro in various FOP-related DRs. JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.) 05:35, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: So much for COM:PEOPLE, then; maybe all these could be slapped with a {{Personality}}. If you have concerns about your countryman, then the right place is AN/U, not a DR (nor the VP). Your nomination only claims alledged redundancy, which have been addressed. -- Tuválkin✉✇ 05:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted per nomination. These certainly are redundant to the many near-duplicate images already in its category. --P 1 9 9✉ 20:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Another set of redundant and repetitive images of a same subject - Wish FM Bus parked at a mall in Bulacan. Redundant to both File:9723FM Bus of Wish 107.11.jpg and File:9723FM Bus of Wish 107.6.jpg. The judge-uploader has been notified several times to be more selective in choosing which images to be uploaded. Uploading redundant images is leaning towards COM:SPAM as treating Commons as a "cloud / webhost" laden with numerous unused images.
The Category:Wish FM Bus has only 12 photos, Vide very notable articles DWNUBreakthrough and Milestones Productions International; patrickroque01 and Author Julan Shirwod Nueva and Own Author Kindrei with one each; and I only took 9 photos in different area, and mine is at SM Baliwag; but the shots were taken at different angles, since it is very hard to take a complete shot of the entire bus; please take a closer look and the angle by angle photography, there are no look alikes or redundancy; hence, I submit my comment for the sound discretion of Commons as Community ....Judgefloro (talk) 06:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Judgefloro: the angles may be different, but these images are same to each other: these depict the same subject. There is redundancy. You can only tell it's not redundant if the two subjects are different, either the subjects themselves or the location where the subject is situated. For example, one image depicts the bus in Marilao, and the other image depicts the same bus in Cabanatuan (not the same bus in the same spot of Marilao, but in different angle). If you desire images of the same subject at different angles, perhaps two or three is enough. JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.) 14:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Redundancy is a good thing. -- Tuválkin✉✇ 20:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted per nomination. Redundancy doesn't make sense when we already have near-duplicate images in its category. --P 1 9 9✉ 20:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
In the Philippines, the Safe Spaces Act prohibits "uploading or sharing of one’s photos without consent". (See also this explanation.) There's no indication that the subjects consented to having their photos taken or uploaded here.
I checked two ofthese images randomly and that was enough to see that this is yet another BS DR motivated likely by nothing else than spite at the uploader’s place at the top of the chart, regardless of value of the rationale stated: Individual privacy laws are a concern for public candid shots, but when faces take up a dozen blurry pixels that concern is misplaced and being misused as a mere prop in the neverending deletionist war. Keep all, obviously — if there’s anything here that should be deleted, lets have a proper reason. -- Tuválkin✉✇ 12:07, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My input: upon checking several files, it appears there are no issues regarding consent. In particular, the guy at File:9610Cuisine food of Bulacan Baliuag 35.jpg appears to be smiling at the photographer which means he agreed to be photographed. None of the images I check depict persons that are "topless" (is the biker guy here topless? I don't think so). Meaning to say, it is acceptable to host them here (no topless persons shown, as far as within the scope of my review, as I haven't review all files). File:9568Baliuag, Bulacan Province 56.jpg depicts a normal street scene where it is unavoidable to include folks. Lean towards Keep (but that is per my checking as, I repeat, haven't checked them all). ButDeleteFile:0452Angat San Roque Santo Cristo Santa Cruz Poblacion 03.jpg as a possible no Philippine FOP violation, and it is accepted here that architecture is a form of artistic work, as long as a degree of hard work is exerted, "irrespective of their mode or form of expression, as well as of their content, quality and purpose." (Sec. 172.2 of RA 8293). Undelete it if FOP is introduced here, maybe next year or around Yuletide season, but not as early as month of fall (as it seems involved stakeholders on potential impacts of FOP are yet to be consulted). JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.) 12:35, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Isn't the whole point of the law to prevent harassment in public spaces? A quick ctrl+f for "photo" or "video" seems like the part of the law related to media is in relation to the likelihood of the photo being used for harassment. Because it's not like they banned the use of CCTV (in fact they encourage it). And the whole "uploading or sharing of one’s photos without consent", is that referring to the photos that the victims already possess (like on their phones) or like the photos that others take of them? I recognize that the law is written in a confusing manner, but such a strict interpretation that prevents any persons to appear in videos or photos without explicit consent would mean that news outlets like ANC 247 or Inquirer.net are breaking the law right? — BriefEdits (talk) 23:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Kept some per discussion above. But deleted many. Some were indeed too personal (like portrait photos of non-notable persons). And as with many of Judgefloro's uploads, they are uncurated: near duplicates, bad compositions, unusable. Also kept File:0452Angat San Roque Santo Cristo Santa Cruz Poblacion 03.jpg because it is a plain box building, nothing really propriety there. --P 1 9 9✉ 14:54, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
COM:SPAM and fulfill COM:WEBHOSTing. Commons is not a social media platform where dozens of relatively useless images are being dumped hour by hour. Yet another set of contributions by the now blocked uploader, who is suspected to be w:Florentino Floro.
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9✉ 13:44, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9✉ 13:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Comment there are more such images in most (if not all) of subcats of Category:Ants of the Philippines. Some may be useful, but I cannot review them all as the COM:WEBHOST-type images have intermingled with them. Admins or veteran users' intervention may be needed. JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.) 08:10, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9✉ 13:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
COM:Derivative works: of a map and various photographs. There is no freedom of panorama for such works. The map is undated but I suspect the map dates to 90s or 2000s considering the print and age of map degradation. For others, the photos look as if they are recent and the photographers must be still alive. COM:VRT correspondence of permissions from the heirs of the map's author and photographers of the photos are required.
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9✉ 13:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Derivative work violation. Billboards, no COM:FOP Philippines, and missing COM:VRT correspondence of authorization for Judgefloro's use of commercial license from the graphic artists.
Comment More files that I didn't nominate is at 
Agree Although 
Unsure With regards to current standing of the Philippines on FOP, I agree yet the subject of the image is a mass-produced generic work and does not violate the 
Delete 
.jpg){kind=link}
