User talk:Soumya-8974
Category:Reentry vehicles[edit]
Hi, here at Commons we try to work by some approximation of group consensus. So opening a discussion about a category, renaming it anyway, then closing the discussion just seven minutes later is hardly "consensus", is it? Andy Dingley (talk) 11:59, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- I didn't rename the category Reentry vehicles to Reentry modules after a CfD. Instead, I boldly redirected the former to the latter. I can restore the category if necessary. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 12:39, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, — Huntster (t @ c) 12:41, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
TransHab[edit]
I'm not sure I understand this edit. Full scale prototypes were built prior to its cancellation, so it squarely fits the criteria of Category:Cancelled NASA programs. — Huntster (t @ c) 08:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, I didn't realise this. Thank you. Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 08:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Cleanup Schriever Space Force Base[edit]
Recently, I am trying to reorganize most of the categories related to the US Space Force. However, when I renamed the Schriever Air Force Base category to Schriever Space Force Base and tried to move all the files, I found that the files moved to a maintenance category instead, and when I tried to move all those files in the maintenance categories back to SSFB, I found that several images unrelated to the base (or any kind of military in particular) are also categorized. So I need expert editors to cleanup the category. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 11:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Why remove category[edit]
Why remove the category of Cape Caveral LC-26 from the photo of the LC-26 blockhouse( File:LC-26 blockhouse.jpg? Bubba73 (talk) 07:12, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Actually, there is a museum at the location of former LC-26 called Air Force Space and Missile Museum. So when I categorized this under LC-26, I found that it causes a problem of overcategorization. So I removed the LC-26 blockhouse from the category. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 07:17, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Category:Apollo_Lunar_Modules_by_name[edit]
Apollo Lunar Modules by name has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Andy Dingley (talk) 19:10, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Special:Diff/615261599[edit]
I'm sorry to inform you that your edit has turned all "China photographs taken on" categories into redirects, causing mass maintenance problems.--N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 15:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Artist's rending of Mars Climate Orbiter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.